Always close iterators?

Axel Rauschmayer axel at
Thu Mar 26 01:39:33 UTC 2015

>> Given that redundant calls to `return()` don’t make a difference (h/t Bergi)
> I'm sorry, that was not 100% accurate.

Right, ignore that part of my email. My main argument is: “wouldn’t the iteration protocol be simpler if iterators were always closed (versus only if iteration finishes abruptly)?”

Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
axel at

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list