Iterating default function arguments

Andrea Giammarchi andrea.giammarchi at
Wed Mar 25 16:39:54 UTC 2015

Sounds good to me and makes perfect sense. Robin?

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at> wrote:

> Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
>> I think the answer is still a static `[a, b]` as list of arguments to
>> apply, but I can see some lack of "reflection" capability ... or maybe
>> Reflect would solve this?
> Yes, Reflect -- we want a mirror approach, not more magic object like
> arguments or function.
> /be
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list