How to fix the `class` keyword
joeedh at gmail.com
Wed Mar 4 16:00:31 UTC 2015
As someone who has fifty or sixty thousand lines of code using the new
class syntax, I find this hard to understand. When I run into cases that
aren't suited for the new class syntax, the solution is easy: *I don't use
it*. If one tool isn't fit for the job, pick up another! After all, no
one is proposing we *remove* the old prototypal stuff.
The class syntax solves one set of problems. The more flexible prototypal
stuff solves another, and from my own experience they work pretty well
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Benjamin (Inglor) Gruenbaum <
inglor at gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you seriously just plug your blog post in es-discuss?
> Are you really explaining the open-closed principle and composition vs
> inheritance to a mailing list of people interested in language design?
> About why class is added:
> ECMAScript would have looked different had it been designed from scratch
> today - but given your criticism everything apart from mixins for classes
> is impossible without breaking compatibility and mixins are being explored
> separately anyway.
> From: Eric Elliott <eric at paralleldrive.com>
> > I've already posted this on my Medium blog here:
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss