Class double-bind

Jason Orendorff jason.orendorff at
Wed Mar 4 12:23:12 UTC 2015

I guess we are just going to disagree here. Double bindings with
mutability still seem clearly bad. I can't make sense of the rationale
that classes can cope with every external binding being mutable except
for, somehow, their own name, and we're doing users a favor by
"protecting" them from "tampering" for just this one binding in this
one place.


More information about the es-discuss mailing list