Example of real world usage of function bind syntax

Matthew Robb matthewwrobb at gmail.com
Thu Jun 11 15:32:06 UTC 2015

@Sebastian It would be interesting to explore having a defined method of
deprecation for features. Basically say this bind syntax is being dropped,
I'd like Babel to be able to transpile all of my SOURCE files to remove
it's usage. Has anything like this been discussed before?

- Matthew Robb

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Domenic Denicola <d at domenic.me> wrote:

> From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-bounces at mozilla.org] On Behalf Of
> Matthew Robb
> > ​​I would be significantly less excited about it if this happens. The
> ability to pass around "lightly" bound references to methods is a big deal
> imo and a large part of the value in this proposal.
> Definitely agree. Being able to do `foo.map(::this.bar)` is really great,
> and even `const extracted = ::foo.bar` is nothing to sneeze at.
> I know there's a thread on the issue tracker where a few vocal voices are
> complaining that they want partial application syntax and bikeshedding on
> various operator forms related to that, but I don't think that should
> discourage the excellent benefits that you're giving to everyone but those
> few.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20150611/89207d76/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list