Example of real world usage of function bind syntax
matthewwrobb at gmail.com
Thu Jun 11 15:04:46 UTC 2015
I am extremely excited about this extension proposal as well but:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been considering reducing the scope of the proposal, focusing on the
> "immediate apply" aspect of the operator, while leaving open the option of
> adding the other features at a later time. Specifically,
> - Remove the prefix form of the operator.
> - Restrict the syntax such that an argument list is required after the
> right operand.
I would be significantly less excited about it if this happens. The
ability to pass around "lightly" bound references to methods is a big deal
imo and a large part of the value in this proposal.
Like you said it doesn't matter what train it gets on, if the new release
cadence for ES works as we all hope then it should ultimately stop
mattering what release a feature is officially spec'd in. Ideally once a
feature reaches candidate stage it should be considered ready, right?
- Matthew Robb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss