erights at gmail.com
Wed Jun 10 14:47:58 UTC 2015
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com>
> On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:53 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Mark S. Miller <erights at google.com>
>> Do you ever test that the object returned by `Promise#timeout(n)` is
>> something other than a plain promise?
> Responded on the other thread.
> Let's keep this one focused on: do we need to tweak the definitions of
> `Promise.all` and `Promise.race` as they relate to species, and if so: how?
> Option 1: don't consult species at all; Option 2: use species for
> intermediate results, but don't use species for final result; Option 3: you
> tell me!
> Since I'm personally rationalizing away the current behavior as grody but
> acceptable, I'm particularly interested in hearing "me, toos" (via private
> email to me or Allen) if you think we should make a change.
> I agree that the current behavior is "grody, but acceptable" for
> Promise.all and Promise.race
I agree that it is acceptable. Since we're not going to change it, I
withhold judgement on whether it is goofy ;).
> However, I think that Promise.reject should parallel Promise.resolve and
> hence it should not use species.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss