allen at wirfs-brock.com
Wed Jun 10 14:37:39 UTC 2015
On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:53 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Mark S. Miller <erights at google.com> wrote:
> Do you ever test that the object returned by `Promise#timeout(n)` is something other than a plain promise?
> Responded on the other thread.
> Let's keep this one focused on: do we need to tweak the definitions of `Promise.all` and `Promise.race` as they relate to species, and if so: how?
> Option 1: don't consult species at all; Option 2: use species for intermediate results, but don't use species for final result; Option 3: you tell me!
> Since I'm personally rationalizing away the current behavior as grody but acceptable, I'm particularly interested in hearing "me, toos" (via private email to me or Allen) if you think we should make a change.
I agree that the current behavior is "grody, but acceptable" for Promise.all and Promise.race
However, I think that Promise.reject should parallel Promise.resolve and hence it should not use species.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss