Look-behind proposal

Sebastian Zartner sebastianzartner at gmail.com
Wed Jun 3 11:44:06 UTC 2015


Thank you for picking this up again!
I asked for adding look-behinds back in 2013[1], though I didn't find the
time to come up with an algorithm and read into writing this down for the
specification.
So let's hope this discussion will result in something this time.

Sebastian

[1] https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2013-September/033837.html

On 21 May 2015 at 14:01, Nozomu Katō <noz.ka at akenotsuki.com> wrote:

> I revised my proposal for lookbehinds:
> http://www.akenotsuki.com/misc/srell/lookbehind_proposal.html
>
> I rewrote the paragraphs about how to count Atoms in Disjunction, to
> clarify that the recursive call is used for nested Disjunctions.
>
> Regards,
>   Nozomu
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20150603/e42ae5e4/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list