await on synchronous functions
Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Fri Jul 17 21:37:43 UTC 2015
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:
> I know the spec for this isn't finalized, but what is the current
>> direction for the behaviour when await is used on a function that is not
>> marked async and doesn't return a Promise? Should it run immediately or
>> wait for the next turn of the event loop?
>>
>
> More generally, the question is: what should await do for non-promises?
>
> await 1;
>
> Should it force a job to be queued?
>
Yes, absolutely. It must be equivalent to
Promise.resolve(1).then(..success-continuation-of-await..,
..error-continuation-of-await..)
though of course for the original bindings of Promise.resolve and .then
rather than the current bindings.
--
Cheers,
--MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20150717/1d03d284/attachment.html>
More information about the es-discuss
mailing list