Will any new features be tied to constructors?
bzbarsky at mit.edu
Thu Jul 2 03:45:55 UTC 2015
On 7/1/15 11:39 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> but upon re-reading that I see that I missed the "at least" in "at least one reserved slot"
Yeah, it's hiding in there pretty well. ;)
I actually do have a related question, though. In the private state
proposals we're talking about, how would it be observable whether the
private slots the class defines are in fact allocated as part of the
object's allocation or separately?
More information about the es-discuss