classes and enumerability

Andrea Giammarchi andrea.giammarchi at
Fri Jan 30 22:32:45 PST 2015

Uhm...yes, Anne or Boris, or anyone behind IDL that might have felt disrespected.

Best Regards

-----Original Message-----
From: "Brendan Eich" <brendan at>
Sent: ‎31/‎01/‎2015 05:58
To: "Andrea Giammarchi" <andrea.giammarchi at>
Cc: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk at>; "es-discuss" <es-discuss at>
Subject: Re: classes and enumerability

Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> Do we agree this class decision was a good one? Perfect, then let's 
> move on to another thread and discuss how things could be better from 
> "both worlds" point of view in the future.

I'm not sure why you replied to me, since I (and everyone on TC39) has 
agreed to make the decision for class methods to be non-enumerable, so 
we must all agree that decision was a good one! :-P

Probably you're replying to Anne, indirectly.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list