Clarification regarding "top level" arrow functions and "this"/"arguments"

[Brendan Eich]

ECMA-357 (E4X) pioneered informative-first prose sections, not found in 
ECMA-262 Ed. 3, and as a direct consequence, had too many imprecise or 
even inaccurate informative notes, which (turns out) were misread as 
normative, or simply otherwise caused confusion.

Thanks for looking into fixing this.

/be

Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> Well, that's just an informative note and not normative language.