Clarification regarding "top level" arrow functions and "this"/"arguments"

Brendan Eich brendan at
Wed Jan 21 23:29:46 PST 2015

ECMA-357 (E4X) pioneered informative-first prose sections, not found in 
ECMA-262 Ed. 3, and as a direct consequence, had too many imprecise or 
even inaccurate informative notes, which (turns out) were misread as 
normative, or simply otherwise caused confusion.

Thanks for looking into fixing this.


Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> Well, that's just an informative note and not normative language.

More information about the es-discuss mailing list