Clarification regarding "top level" arrow functions and "this"/"arguments"
brendan at mozilla.org
Wed Jan 21 23:29:46 PST 2015
ECMA-357 (E4X) pioneered informative-first prose sections, not found in
ECMA-262 Ed. 3, and as a direct consequence, had too many imprecise or
even inaccurate informative notes, which (turns out) were misread as
normative, or simply otherwise caused confusion.
Thanks for looking into fixing this.
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> Well, that's just an informative note and not normative language.
More information about the es-discuss