es-discuss Digest, Vol 95, Issue 45

Sebastian McKenzie sebmck at
Tue Jan 20 04:48:57 PST 2015

Reason for the verbose and quirky output in 6to5 is due to performance, see

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Fabrício Matté <ultcombo at>

>> Point 2 is incorrect (e.g. `new (Foo.bind.apply(Foo,
>> [undefined].concat(args)))`).
> I stand corrected. That's very good news, thanks!
> Nice and elegant solution, by the way.
> I should have taken the time to look at how current transpilers handle
> that. Your solution is similar to Traceur's generated output, but it is
> also interesting to see how [6to5 spreads arguments in a NewExpression](
> ).
> Oh, I also had a typo in the previous mail (`s/rest parameters/spread`),
> guess I was a bit too sleepy last night.
> /fm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list