A new ES6 draft is available
rossberg at google.com
Mon Jan 19 02:58:27 PST 2015
On 17 January 2015 at 19:14, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com>
> On Jan 17, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> > On Jan 17, 2015, at 12:31, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com>
> >> If the enclosing function is invoked as a call expression the value of
> `new.target` is null
> > Just curious, why null instead of undefined?
> null is used to indicate no [[Prototype]], so it seem to me to be a better
> match for this situation.
Wouldn't the fact that null is a quasi-legal prototype strongly speak for
using undefined here? Otherwise, it seems you couldn't distinguish Call
invocations from Construct invocations with a prototype that has actually
been set to null (which I suppose is legal?).
(In terms of proper option/maybe types, this is yet another case of a None
vs Some(None) distinction.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss