Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties
Boris Zbarsky
bzbarsky at mit.edu
Thu Jan 15 10:42:45 PST 2015
On 1/15/15 1:22 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> It's what IE does, according to Travis.
I'll let Travis address this.
>> Care to ask the UA implementors who are clearly not doing anything even
>> resembling your spec? Because it might turn out they might have reasons
>> for it...
>
> I've asked you many times.
I'm not one of those implementors. What Gecko does right now is more or
less black-box indistinguishable from your spec, modulo cross-origin
issues. However we may be changing what we do; we'll see.
> Implementations disagreeing with each other doesn't mean the spec is
> undefined.
But it can well mean they're not willing to implement it as written.
> It doesn't match _all_ implementations, certainly.
OK, but have you bothered to find out why?
> Per the HTML spec, there's two ways that WindowProxy can change. One is
> session history traversal. That can never happen with JS on the stack
Are you sure, given showModalDialog?
-Boris
More information about the es-discuss
mailing list