(x) => {foo: bar}

Gary Guo nbdd0121 at hotmail.com
Tue Jan 6 17:34:22 PST 2015

I found that even without shorthand, the object literal can still be ambiguous with block.

```js()=>{  method()  {
shall it be interpreted as()=>({  method(){    // method body  }})
()=>{  method();  {    // block statement  }}```
This is certainly an ambiguity that cannot be resolved by any transformation, or refinement of syntax. (so does the shorthand {x,y,z}) 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20150107/e9a5e8ea/attachment.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list