(x) => {foo: bar}

[Brendan Eich]

Frankie Bagnardi wrote:
> That's good news, thanks for the strawman link.  Is it correct to 
> assume this with that proposal?
>
> var f = (x) => (y) => {x, y};
> f(1)(2) // => {x: 1, y: 2};

Good point, the strawman does not take object literal shorthand into 
account and indeed parses {x, y} in an expression context as a block 
expression, not an object literal. More work needed, it was only straw :-P.

To clarify something Caitlin raised: the goal is to enable block 
expressions everywhere, and unify arrow function body on an expression 
nonterminal, eiminating ConciseBody (in ES6) or the two production 
right-parts in

ArrowFunctionExpression :
     ArrowFormalParameters =>  [lookahead ∉ { "{" }] AssignmentExpression
     ArrowFormalParameters =>  Block


from

http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:arrow_function_syntax

/be