Exponentiation operator precedence
jason.orendorff at gmail.com
Wed Aug 26 16:00:39 UTC 2015
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Mark S. Miller <erights at google.com> wrote:
> When the costs were minor, it was ok that the benefits were minor.
The costs will probably still be minor if we just let Rick look at it
and revise the proposal.
What has happened here is
- upon implementing the feature, we noticed a problem
- we thought through it together and found possible solutions
- we found other languages already use these solutions
This seems like less turbulence than average for a new ES feature,
even a minor one. Considering dropping the feature seems premature.
More information about the es-discuss