Exponentiation operator precedence

[Mark S. Miller]

When the costs were minor, it was ok that the benefits were minor. Given
significant costs, we need to ask:

Why do we need ** ? What great benefit does it provide? If nothing
compelling, then this proposal has lost consensus.



On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Claude Pache <claude.pache at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> > Le 25 août 2015 à 03:22, Jason Orendorff <jason.orendorff at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Jason Orendorff
> > <jason.orendorff at gmail.com>
> > P.S. Admittedly it might be a good idea to rename "UnaryExpression" if
> > we put a binary operator in there.
> >
> > -j
>
> "RightAssociativeExpression"?
>
> —Claude
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>



-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20150825/621b6e18/attachment.html>