Jason Orendorff jason.orendorff at
Tue Aug 18 17:09:50 UTC 2015

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Bradley Meck <bradley.meck at> wrote:
> The timing and extensibility is too complex to easily fit into ECMA-262, see
> some things mentioned in . I vote
> no for a few years at least.

I am not calling for importing the entire loader spec into ECMA-262.


More information about the es-discuss mailing list