UInt8ClampedArray Bitwise operators?
isiahmeadows at gmail.com
Thu Aug 13 05:02:34 UTC 2015
Oh. Pardon my ignorance. Misunderstood the idea.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015, 23:19 Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com> wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 7:30 PM, Isiah Meadows wrote:
> I can see why, since nearly everyone depends on that coupling. Minifiers
> depend on it. Mixin utilities depend on it. Breaking the Web would be an
> Not so clear. The proposed default default for an indexed access would be
> exactly the same as for legacy property access. It is pretty much just
> providing a signal to the meta level that opens the possibility of newly
> defined object treating [ ] member accesses differently from . member
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015, 14:36 Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org> wrote:
>> Caitlin Potter wrote:
>> >> ES2015 already has element accessor overloading with proxies, right?
>> >> > It's everything else that's missing.
>> > Proxies enforce invariants, which is problematic for this use case
>> because it’s A) expensive, and B) also restricts you from “lying” about the
>> actual properties which exist on the element.
>> > I recall from an old presentation on Value Types that overloading ``
>> was off limits because those invariants needed to keep working.
>> No operator proposal has included property access, not so much for
>> reasons you give (which are good ones) but for separation of concerns.
>> Allen did propose:
>> This was controversial in the committee when last considered. Just sayin'!
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss