Existential Operator / Null Propagation Operator
joeedh at gmail.com
Wed Apr 8 00:42:53 UTC 2015
That's a good point. Are lexical non-DFA grammars allowed? It would be
trivial to solve that with a regular expression lookahead. Although I
suppose at that point you might as well call it a cover grammar.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org> wrote:
> joe wrote:
>> By the way, I don't remember having grammar issues (I use a LALR
>> compiler-compiler). Looking at my code, it looked like I handled it in the
>> tokenizer stage; I added a COND_DOT token:
>> COND_DOT : \?\.
> Did you keep backward compatibility? `x?.1:y` must continue to work.
No, it looks like I didn't.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss