Existential Operator / Null Propagation Operator
christoph.pojer at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 23:13:32 UTC 2015
So I take it most would prefer this as a prefix operator. What would
be the next steps involved to iterate on this idea?
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org> wrote:
> Yeah, and it would line up with cover grammar needed for
> refutable-by-default patterns.
> Matthew Robb wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org
>> <mailto:brendan at mozilla.org>> wrote:
>> Did you keep backward compatibility? `x?.1:y` must continue to work.
>> This is why I suggested a leading operator (`?a.?b()`) because it seems
>> like it would have the least potential for conflict with existing valid
>> - Matthew Robb
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
More information about the es-discuss