Maximally minimal stack trace standardization

John Lenz concavelenz at gmail.com
Sun Sep 28 16:42:04 PDT 2014


But that said an new name and structure would be fine with me. I'm a little
worried "stack" would be out of sync with "stack trace" or whatever.
Making stack an accesor of "stackTrace" would help but what do we do with
writes?
On Sep 28, 2014 4:35 PM, "John Lenz" <concavelenz at gmail.com> wrote:

> Firefox has changed aspects (adding columns and other things) so I think
> it is possible that we can change this.  Was there hard data otherwise?
> On Sep 28, 2014 6:26 AM, "Erik Arvidsson" <erik.arvidsson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Last time this was tried the conclusion was that the current format using
>> the stack property as a string could not be standardized. Different
>> browsers use different format and therefore the format can not be changed
>> without breaking existing code.
>>
>> The conclusion was that we needed to use a different name and then we
>> might add well stop using a string to represent this structured data.
>>
>> Other than that. Great. +1.
>> On Sep 28, 2014 2:10 AM, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/28/14, 1:15 AM, John Lenz wrote:
>>>
>>>> * the "stack" property (a string)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd somewhat like to see this be an accessor, to allow implementations
>>> to compute the stack string lazily.
>>>
>>>  Does this sound like a reasonable minimal set?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> -Boris
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140928/240d5ca2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list