Function.arguments in JSC

Axel Rauschmayer axel at rauschma.de
Sun Sep 28 02:59:03 PDT 2014


Out of historical curiosity: was `Function.arguments` ever useful for anything? Why not simply use `arguments`?

On Sep 28, 2014, at 6:51 , John Lenz <concavelenz at gmail.com> wrote:

> I took a look at Google's internal code index for reference to Function.prototype.arguments and turned up many references to it (PhpMyAdmin, some Intel benchmark, some internal code, etc).  This is only code used internally at Google (or was at one time) and not by any means an index of the entire web, but it does use the Closure Compiler and type information to accurately find references.  These are not just simply references to an "arguments" property but are references to the "arguments" property off of objects know to be functions.    These references roughly (from my quick perusal), were about 50% were V8 or similar unit tests, 25% references that could be trivially replaced with a reference to the active function's "arguments" variable, and 25% were doing something tricky  (Function.caller.arguments, someevent.handler.arguments).    
> 
> I'm sure you didn't expect that there would be zero breakage, but I wanted to give you a heads up that there might be more than you expect. 
> 
>   
> 
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Oliver Hunt <oliver at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi all, as a heads up we’re going to be doing an experiment in our tree to see if we can kill off the function.arguments property entirely.
> 
> We’re super hopeful we can make it go away safely, and we’ll post a follow up when we have some actual information about what happens.
> 
> If you’re interested in following directly you can track the bug: http://webkit.org/b/137167
> 
> —Oliver

-- 
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
axel at rauschma.de
rauschma.de



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140928/d9cb70cd/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list