new instantiation design alternatives

Rick Waldron waldron.rick at gmail.com
Sun Sep 14 18:01:57 PDT 2014


On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com>
wrote:

>
> On Sep 14, 2014, at 5:27 PM, Rick Waldron wrote:
>
>
>
> As a follow up to these comments re: `this = new super(x, y);`, I couldn't
> find anything in this thread or the gists that discussed how, if at all,
> `super` syntax or semantics will change in method bodies.
>
>
> See the third file in each of the two alternative gists (Specifically,
> https://gist.github.com/allenwb/5160d109e33db8253b62#file-3super-rules-md
>  and
> https://gist.github.com/allenwb/53927e46b31564168a1d#summary-of-revised-semantics-for-super-based-references which
> I believe are identical)
>
> The last file in each gist (
> https://gist.github.com/allenwb/5160d109e33db8253b62#file-5nakedsuperrationale-md
> <https://gist.github.com/allenwb/5160d109e33db8253b62#file-5nakedsuperrationale-md%C2%A0,%20again%20should%20be%20the%20same%20in%20each%20gist>)
> is the rationale for this part of the design.
>

Thanks—there was a lot to read through and this is exactly what I was
looking for.

Rick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140914/ec86beae/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list