new instantiation design alternatives

Jason Orendorff jason.orendorff at gmail.com
Thu Sep 11 13:38:25 PDT 2014


I meant to add: I think it's *great* that we're still iterating on
this. Surely there's a way.

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Jason Orendorff
<jason.orendorff at gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems like new^ is a new argument that is implicitly passed to all functions.
>
> What does new^ mean in an arrow function?
>
> How does new^ interact with a proxy whose target is a constructor?
>
> -j
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
> <allen at wirfs-brock.com> wrote:
>> oh oops!  they are supposed to be "new^".  Will fix...
>>
>> On Sep 11, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/11/14, 12:35 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
>>>> https://gist.github.com/allenwb/291035fbf910eab8e9a6  summaries the
>>>>  main syntactic changes since the meeting and provides rationales them.
>>>> These features are common  to both alternates.  this is a good place to
>>>> start, after reading the meeting notes.
>>>
>>> Allen, thanks for putting this together!
>>>
>>> I have a question: what do the uses of "this^" in this document mean? Are those meant to be "new^"?
>>>
>>> -Boris
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss


More information about the es-discuss mailing list