import script --> .esm
emanuelallen at hotmail.com
Wed Sep 10 10:59:21 PDT 2014
> On Sep 10, 2014, at 12:14 PM, "Brendan Eich" <brendan at mozilla.org> wrote:
> Matthew Robb wrote:
>> Personally I have felt this way for a long time as well. I think `.esm` is somewhat confusing since most js developers don't really think about it as EcmaScript.
> (sounds like a skin disease...)
I have to comment on this... I have read the fact that you felt like this about the name ES, but reading your words exactly expression this, is another thing.
> RFC4329 rightly favors application/ -- but this is all beyond the scope of ECMA-262. Do Not Want TC39 deciding suffixes. Let developers develop conventions. (Just so long as they do not sound like skin diseases.)
Or easily be em--ECMAScript-Module-- and the same for jm
Someone need to set a convention...
I on the other hand will be using esm extension, cause I favorite the spec name more.
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
More information about the es-discuss