import script --> .esm

Matthew Robb matthewwrobb at gmail.com
Wed Sep 10 10:22:55 PDT 2014


I think the following section should change:
http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-ecmascript-language-scripts-and-modules

Rather than presenting two separate but equal things here it should be
instead describe the ideal and as an addition reference the legacy.


- Matthew Robb

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Matthew Robb <matthewwrobb at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well it sounds like in lieu of `.js2` we will need `.js-a` and `.js-b` and
> will need to explain this to new developers. It would be easier to explain
> the world as it should be and then explain the legacy path as what it is...
> Legacy and should be ignored as much as possible.
>
>
> - Matthew Robb
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org> wrote:
>
>> Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
>>
>> I suggest "js2"
>>
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>>
>> [image: Nope Nope Nope Octopus]
>>
>> /be
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140910/b795939d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: nope.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 936943 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140910/b795939d/attachment-0001.gif>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list