import script --> .esm
brendan at mozilla.org
Wed Sep 10 09:14:22 PDT 2014
Matthew Robb wrote:
> Personally I have felt this way for a long time as well. I think
> `.esm` is somewhat confusing since most js developers don't really
> think about it as EcmaScript.
(sounds like a skin disease...)
> I would think you could just as easily do `.jsm` but this also
> suggests that files of this alternate should be served with a
> along those lines.
RFC4329 rightly favors application/ -- but this is all beyond the scope
of ECMA-262. Do Not Want TC39 deciding suffixes. Let developers develop
conventions. (Just so long as they do not sound like skin diseases.)
More information about the es-discuss