pyalot at gmail.com
Mon May 19 07:10:32 PDT 2014
Well, it is a thread on bytecode, that had a discussion on bytecode, but
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Till Schneidereit <
till at tillschneidereit.net> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Florian Bösch <pyalot at gmail.com> wrote:
>> So just so I get this straight. You're talking about a bytecode format,
>> which implies some kind of revamped features/VM to run it, but you won't be
>> discussing anything other than ECMAScript as the targeting semantic. Sorry
>> to say, but then that's a pretty useless discussion entirely.
> No, I don't want to talk about a bytecode format *at all*. At least not on
> this list, as this list is about ECMAScript, and nothing else. If you want
> to make the case for a bytecode format for the web, take it to some other
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss