module exports

Kevin Smith zenparsing at
Fri Mar 14 07:12:11 PDT 2014

>     export { foo as default };
>> I fail to see why sugar over this form is necessary.
> I completely agree. Plus if this is taken away then the "import" keyword
> can be used to get the whole module as in my example above. At that point
> maybe there is no need for the "module" keyword.

Maybe, but at this point that would be too big of a change to swallow.  I
think if we can just focus on eliminating this one pointless and confusing
aspect (the export default [expr] form), we'll be good to go.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list