Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(O) ? // plural
andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com
Tue Mar 4 11:40:41 PST 2014
*N* years is actually critical.
Luckily it's not so difficult to polyfill but if you have Rick presenting
[something like this](
I really hope there would be an exception or at least a remote possibility
it'd squeeze in :-)
I'd be very happy in any case if considered for the future.
Once again, a huge thanks for Rick effort and André too helping with the
simplified yet more accurate version of the proposal.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com>wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 10:17 AM, Rick Waldron wrote:
>> I like this cloning idiom, but I don't see why we would consider this for
>> ES6, it isn't something that is critical or can't be implemented via ES
>> code. It would be much more appropriate to queue it up for the 2015 train.
>> ES6: let's wrap this sucker up!
> I agree with this, but time permitting I want to at least get something
> Presenting is cool, actually necessary to get in on the next train. But
> unless something is really critical, let's not try to squeeze it into ES6
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss