ModuleImport

Kevin Smith zenparsing at gmail.com
Fri Jun 27 12:33:00 PDT 2014


>
>   import {f, g, h} from "url"
>   f(); g(); h()
>
> or
>
>   module M from "url"
>   M.f(); M.g(); M.h()
>
> These should be freely interchangeable -- the programmer shouldn't
> need to pick between getting import checking but polluting the scope
> and making uses less readable, or the other way round. The current
> semantics falls short on that, it doesn't check in the latter case.
>

I didn't even realize that was the case.


>
> So from my perspective, that would need to be fixed as well. Which
> would be fairly easy.
>

I totally agree.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140627/c6cef333/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list