Module Default Export Syntax

[Calvin Metcalf]

The place where the current syntax shines is when dealing with anonymous
values,
On Jun 25, 2014 1:29 AM, "Barronville, Jonathan" <jonathan at belairlabs.com>
wrote:

> Kevin, you're not alone :) . I like that last form, too.
>
> - Jonathan
> —
> Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <axel at rauschma.de>
> wrote:
>
>> I do like the conciseness of the last form. The other forms do indeed not
>> seem very useful.
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2014, at 5:45 , Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>     ExportDeclaration:
>>>         ...
>>>         export default ClassDeclaration
>>>         export default FunctionDeclaration
>>>         export default GeneratorDeclaration
>>>         export default = AssignmentExpression
>>>
>>>
>> To reply to myself (since no one else appears to be interested), I think
>> it might even be best to drop these special forms altogether.  The
>> non-sugared form of:
>>
>>     export { someVar as default };
>>
>> is already very concise, and will help developers understand what this
>> whole "default" thing is about.  The sugar appears to be obfuscating the
>> design, and is doing more harm than good.
>>
>> Again, thoughts?
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
>> axel at rauschma.de
>> rauschma.de
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140625/a9dfc82c/attachment-0001.html>