ModuleImport

C. Scott Ananian ecmascript at cscott.net
Tue Jun 24 07:36:02 PDT 2014


On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>> Lots of things are breaking API changes.  Changing the name of one of the
>> named exports, for instance.  Critically, in Ron's proposal, you *can*
>> change a default export to named exports later (or vice versa) *without
>> changing the users of the module*.
>>
>
> Maybe, but certainly not without completely redoing the semantics.  Do you
> think that's possible, at this point?
>

I don't agree that the changes to the semantics are large, if we're talking
about simply allowing a single syntactic form for both named and default
import and Ron's option (A) (where default and named exports can not
co-exist... until ES7 at least).
  --scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140624/aaa8066f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list