Brendan Eich brendan at
Thu Jun 19 20:42:21 PDT 2014

Domenic Denicola wrote:
> This is part of a larger issue regarding the messaging of TC39 and versioned ECMAScript, which is somewhat out of touch with [reality](


>   I hope we can discuss this at the next TC39 meeting. But I don't mean to derail the thread.

Too late.

>> >  ```js
>> >  import * as fs from "fs"; // importing the named exports as an object
>> >  ```
> This looks great. Other alternatives I thought about in response included `import { * } as fs from "fs"` and `import module fs from "fs"`, but upon consideration the brevity of yours wins.
> I just hope we can do better documenting it, this time around, and fixing the many transpilers with their confusing semantics.

Finalize the normative spec, see what happens.


More information about the es-discuss mailing list