@@new

[Jason Orendorff]

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think Allen's suggestion of providing constructor arguments to @@create
>> is promising.  That would allow the implementation to allocate and
>> initialize an object in one go, if desired.  That seems to embody the
>> advantages of fusing initialization and allocation, without the headache for
>> the user.
>
> Never mind,  that doesn't work. Sorry for the noise.

I'd like to understand. Why doesn't it work?

-j