Null iterable in for-of?

[Allen Wirfs-Brock]

On Jun 17, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:

>> It sounds like the the tide is swinging towards bug finding rather than consistency in this case.  I'm fine with and and will update the spec. accordingly.
> 
> The conclusion here wasn't exactly clear to me. Is it the following?
> 
> - for-in continues to do zero iterations
> - for-of throws a TypeError
> - comprehensions throw a TypeError
> 

yes