IsConstructor

[Boris Zbarsky]

On 6/13/14, 1:21 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> It isn't clear if there are really any use cases that could be supported by @@new that couldn't also be support by carefully crafting a @@create and companion constructor function.

I agree. I was assuming in my mail trying to make sure I understand the 
implications of @@new and @@create that @@new would be a replacement for 
@@create, not something alongside it.  I'm not sure here are 
particularly good reasons to have both, unless I'm _really_ missing 
something.

-Boris