bzbarsky at MIT.EDU
Thu Jun 12 12:25:14 PDT 2014
On 6/12/14, 3:21 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> simply not knowing whether all of the DOM [[Construct]] semantics could be successfully replaced replaced using only @@create methods and constructor bodies.
WebIDL currently doesn't use a custom [[Construct]] at all. It uses a
custom [[Call]] on DOM constructors.
Chances are, we want to move from that to using @@create or whatever is
needed to allow subclassing. In either case, I don't think we'll be
doing custom [[Construct]] in the DOM.
More information about the es-discuss