Why using the size property in set

Nathan Wall wwall at google.com
Thu Jul 31 05:24:28 PDT 2014

Also, whether this was intentional or not, I think it's nice for objects
with `length` properties to all have properties at indices from `0` to
`length` (so they work in the `Array.prototype` methods) making `'length'
in foo` a lazy-man's `isArrayLike`.

var forEach = Function.prototype.call.bind(Array.prototype.forEach);
forEach('foo', function(u) {

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:21 AM, David Bruant <bruant.d at gmail.com> wrote:

> Le 31/07/2014 09:25, Maxime Warnier a écrit :
>  Hi everybody,
>> I was reading the doc for the new Set method and something suprised me :
>> Why Set uses the size method instead of the length property ?
> IIRC and with my own words "length" refers more to something that can be
> measured contiguously (like a distance or a number of allocated bytes,
> etc.) while "size" doesn't have this contiguous aspect to it.
> David
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140731/8ab0e952/attachment.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list