Generator return() and exceptions
allen at wirfs-brock.com
Thu Jul 24 10:45:32 PDT 2014
On Jul 24, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Nathan Wall wrote:
> Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> > So going back to my original questions. Given that we now have return()
> > available to close an abnormally discarded generator, when would somebody
> > (presumably implementing a control abstraction) actually want to apply
> > throw() rather than return() to an iterator?
> Sorry, I may be misunderstanding, but what about the use from Task.js?
> The above should log "from foo". Wouldn't `throw()` be needed for that?
Right, that's the use case I was lookingor. Also mentioned by Jeremy in an earlier response.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss