Specifying template strings
waldron.rick at gmail.com
Wed Jul 9 12:41:51 PDT 2014
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <axel at rauschma.de> wrote:
> I find the specification of template strings still a bit difficult to
> – The abbreviations TV and CV are used 12.2.9, but defined in 22.214.171.124.
Did you mean TV and TRV?
This is no different than:
- String SV and CV
- Number MV
Which are all defined in Chapter 11
> – Tagged templates are explained
> via EvaluateCall(tagRef, TemplateLiteral, tailCall). I think it would be
> easier to understand if it used GetTemplateCallSite.
> – It’d be nice if untagged template strings and tagged templates could be
> mentioned closer together. They are basically the same thing and this
> structure seems to be dictated by grammar. To me, template strings are more
> like tagged templates without a tag. Would it make sense to specify them
> that way?
(no response, I'll let Allen address these)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss