andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com
Sun Jan 12 20:45:27 PST 2014
Rick, what you wrote has _nothing_ to do with inheritance, right? So why
should "classes" methods be part of a for/in of an instance, which is not
what you wrote, again? Thanks
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
> andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Allen, makes sense ... but still no example where enumerability of
>> properties and method defined in a "class" prototype is useful for ...
>> something I cannot imagine right now.
>> Again, that was never the argument, but simply a by-product of making
> concise method definitions behave the same way as function expression
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss