Behavior of `eval` in non strict mode.
brendan at mozilla.com
Fri Jan 10 20:12:57 PST 2014
Things to complain about!
JS interop is far better than other languages with multiple implementations. Never mind complex APIs such as the DOM.
> On Jan 10, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've learned it the hard way ... when in doubt, see what Firefox does ... usually that's the meant standard behavior.
> Best Regards
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Benjamin (Inglor) Gruenbaum <inglor at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks, this clarifies things. I'll update the answer on SO to reflect the findings.
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:54 AM, André Bargull <andre.bargull at udo.edu> wrote:
>>>> Thanks for the reply.
>>>> I'd actually expect `undefined` because function declarations does not
>>>> return anything. Converting it to a function expression kind of misses the
>>>> point since those are well... expressions :)
>>>> I've tried looking in all the relevant places in the spec but still
>>>> couldn't unambiguously figure out which browser is 'correct'.
>>> There are a few edge cases in reference resolution which are not correctly implemented in most browsers. Your example is basically the same as test case 2 from https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1751. The relevant section in the specification is "12.13.4 Runtime Semantics: Evaluation": The left hand side of an assignment is always evaluated before the right hand side. This includes resolving and remembering the reference information for an identifier reference. In this case the identifier reference resolves to a binding on the global object, so assignment must be performed on the global, even if a (direct) eval expression introduces new bindings with the same name in the current scope.
>>> - André
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss