Can `let`, `static` and `yield` still be used as Identifier?

Erik Arvidsson erik.arvidsson at gmail.com
Mon Dec 29 06:39:10 PST 2014


This is a bug in Traceur.

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014, 11:35 Gary Guo <nbdd0121 at hotmail.com> wrote:

> From the specification I saw `yield` is being explicitly declared as an
> possible Identifier in non-strict mode, and there `let`, `static` are
> parsed as identifier first. However, I did not see anyway to distinguish
> `let` identifier and `let` keyword. `let=1` is parsed as illegal in
> traceur, and so does `static=1`. Is this a bug of traceur or it is
> intended? It would be incompatible in non-strict mode if this is intended.
> (And if this is intended, there will be no reason for keep `let` and
> `static` non-reserved-word during lex stage)
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20141229/d40cf147/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list