What would a 1JS-friendly strict mode look like?

Mark S. Miller erights at google.com
Fri Dec 19 09:17:37 PST 2014


On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Bradley Meck <bradley.meck at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Can you even deprecate sloppy mode?
>

If you mean, can we get rid of it? Then no.

If you mean, can we discourage people from using it, and sneer at the
people who still do? Then yes.

Otherwise, please clarify what you mean by the question. Thanks.



> I know dev tools often use it to inject the dev console extension APIs
> safely
>

Why do they need sloppy mode for this?




> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Jason Orendorff <
> jason.orendorff at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> AK> I think we should either deprecate one of the modes, or officially
>> support multiple modes and provide a method to switch between them.
>>
>> MM> Feel free to consider sloppy mode deprecated. I do.
>>
>> CP> Well sure, but unfortunately it’s not going to just disappear :(
>>
>> MM> See how much good deprecating it did?
>>
>> ...and, scene.
>>
>> If I had a nickel for every time a conversation about web standards
>> went exactly like this, I would be All Set For Lunch. For weeks.
>>
>> :)
>>
>> -j
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>


-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20141219/fdaf4335/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list