Importing modules inside HTML imports

Rick Waldron waldron.rick at gmail.com
Sun Aug 17 11:14:19 PDT 2014


On Sunday, August 17, 2014, John Barton <johnjbarton at google.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','brendan at mozilla.org');>> wrote:
>
>> John Barton wrote:
>>
>>  On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','brendan at mozilla.org');> <mailto:
>>> brendan at mozilla.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','brendan at mozilla.org');>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Yes -- inline scripts, like document.write, the drive-in, disco,
>>>     and Fortran, will never die.
>>>
>>>
>>> More things I don't suggest investing effort in.
>>>
>>
>> Seriously, inline scripts were and are important, both for avoiding extra
>> requests (even with HTTP++ these cost) and, more important, for easiest and
>> smoothest beginner/first-script on ramp.
>>
>> I have no idea why anyone would seriously contend otherwise. Latency
>> still matters; tools didn't replace hand-authoring. These are not
>> subjective matters.
>
>
> I agree, but the forces behind CSP control the servers.  You'll have to
> convince them.
>

Forgive me, but I don't follow this—could you elaborate? It would be
appreciated.

Rick



>
>
>>
>>
>> /be
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140817/5d88ce6b/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list